|
|
8.8 Site Visits
8.8.1 Motivation Site visits are, of course, a necessary component of all NSF-sponsored
centers. In most centers, Student Leadership Councils (SLCs) significantly
assist in the preparation and execution of these annual reviews. Site
visits provide students with opportunities to showcase their research
efforts and achievements, as well as network with visiting scholars. Providing
the student perspective is critical at these reviews, and the SLC should
facilitate this process and help organize the student body of the center. 8.8.2 Summary of Survey Results
Almost all centers have poster exhibitions or competitions and other presentations
and demonstrations in conjunction with the site visit. In most cases,
the SLC plays some role in the preparations of these presentations. Examples
of assistance include providing poster guidelines, templates, materials,
and printing facilities. They also play a major role in organizing the
poster session and competition, when applicable. Preparations begin anywhere
from a few weeks to a few months in advance. Students may only be required
to attend a small portion of the site visit, but are strongly encouraged
to attend as much as possible in most centers, particularly technical
sessions and those which are most closely related to their research. During
the site visit at some centers, students also help with other volunteer
or assigned jobs such as poster session set-up, transportation, and lab
tours.
The other key component of the site visit, from an SLC perspective, is
the presentation of SWOT survey results to the NSF, which was discussed
in Section 8.4.1.
![[Top]](Best%20Practices%20Manual_files/top.jpg)
8.8.3 Multi-University Centers
With regard to site visits, the most significant difference for centers
that span several universities is that there seems to be lower response
rates for SWOT surveys. Although it may seem that multi-university centers
would need to begin preparing further in advance and require greater organization,
a wide range of preparation times was also reported within this subset
of respondents.
![[Top]](Best%20Practices%20Manual_files/top.jpg)
8.8.4 Best Practices and Conclusions
One role of all SLCs is to represent the student body to center administrators
and guests. This is particularly important prior to and during site visits.
In addition, the SLC needs to assist the entire student body as they prepare
for and carry out their duties during the visit.
Preparation
The SLC should work with the administration to determine what is needed
and expected from students well in advance of the site visit. Then, the
SLC must communicate these expectations to the students and assist them
however necessary. Work related to the site visit itself can take a significant
amount of time for students and they must account for this in their schedule.
The SLC can help by distributing the work as evenly as possible and minimizing
the time required to prepare. The SLC should organize the poster session,
which is an important opportunity for students to directly present themselves
and their work to NSF visitors. Students should be provided with specific
instructions on how posters should be designed, what electronic templates
or samples are available, and how posters should be printed and mounted.
The timeline for reviews and submission deadlines of posters, presentations,
and demonstrations should be communicated to the entire student body.
SLC leaders should generate and conduct the SWOT survey more than one
month in advance of the site visit, so that there is sufficient time to
develop a presentation that fully represents the student perspective for
the closed-door session with the NSF during the site visit.
Student Participation
Encouraging full participation of students during site visit events can
be challenging in many centers and the SLC often assists the administration
in this regard. Where students must help with specific tasks and jobs,
many centers first ask for volunteers. If volunteer positions are not
filled, the SLC can help in assigning remaining jobs. Incentives such
as food are often used to encourage participation. In addition, some centers
mandate participation as a condition of funding, to varying levels of
success. Advisors and administrators encourage participation with repeated
reminders and sometimes by verifying attendance. One more positive method
that has been used to increase student participation is to organize the
poster session and/or meals with visitors in a manner that is conducive
to networking.
Student Input
Another best practice is for the SLC members and other students to be
advocates for student concerns during site visits. For instance, student
input regarding scheduling, agendas, session locations, and other issues
are important. Advance notification of visitor names, research interests,
and affiliation can help students be better prepared for questions they
may encounter. It is important for students to be well informed about
results from previous site visit reports as well as overall objectives
and research thrusts of the center. Having effective communication channels
throughout the year is the best way to prepare for site visit reviews.
Many centers accomplish this through seminars and lunches that expose
students to research areas beyond
![[Home]](Best%20Practices%20Manual_files/home.jpg) ![[Top]](Best%20Practices%20Manual_files/top.jpg)
If you have specific comments and questions on the contents of
this site and/or its use, please contact webmaster@erc-assoc.org. To report
technical problems, contact techhelp@erc-assoc.org.
Copyright 2000, Engineering Research Centers
|